Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

 
 

View User's Journal

And now for something completely different...
...or as different as a damned blog can be, anyway. It started out as a project, it devolved into a chronicling of my misanthropy, rage, and occasional fits of glee. It sounds good, though, and might even make you laugh.
Ye gods and little fishes, I'm doomed.
Once again, Jon Stewart appears to be the most lucid of us all.

Far be it from me to advocate gambling. I'm too broke to enjoy it, and every time I've been to one of the gambling towns in the mountains here (Seriously, even restaurants have slots in these places) I've been bored out of my mind. I respond badly to partial reinforcement. I'm also aware that I am really ******** weird in the respect, since most people respond to it right quick, many of those as economically challenged as me. People do indeed get addicted to gambling, and it's easy to run scams on the internet (Believe me, I know. Boy do I know). Flushing one's money down the toilet should not go unchecked. But-- there's always a but-- perhaps going so far overboard is not helpful.

Caution's all well and good, but there is a demonstrable difference between a free site where playing kids' flash games can get you tickets and a site that requires real money and exists to make a profit off people who cannot possibly beat the house. The link here is that you can donate to Gaia, get letters, sell or trade the letters for tokens, and then play games in the now-defunct casino. Aside from being a pretty weak link, it kinda skips over the fact that you can also play the games without ever having spent a real cent on Gaia. The old "reasonable man" argument looks at that and laughs itself sick.

Do I think Gaia promotes gambling? No. Do I think anyone would seriously develop a gambling addiction because of Gold Mountain? No, not unless they already had a lot of other, more serious problems, and even then it wouldn't be all Gaia's fault. Do I think this corrupt minors? No. Do I think these are just games inspired by Chuck E. Cheese type "win tickets, get stuff" systems? Yes. Am I a little irritated that eBay, owner of PayPal, is taking the piss out of us even though they can't bother to follow their own Terms of Usage? Yeah, you bet your a**.

Something I once said to an elderly couple when I was working at a restaurant (There was a mother seated a few tables away actually encouraging her child to scream. Yeah. That's why waiters all smoke) comes to mind here: "Common sense generally isn't." Exercising a little judgement and self-control would have been a much better idea here, but no, no one's bothered yet again. Three cheers, now I'm going to run off to Fiji for my sanity's sake.






User Comments: [5] [add]
Druki
Community Member
avatar
commentCommented on: Thu Oct 05, 2006 @ 05:24pm
I find the whole argument ridiculous, really. Why pick on Gaia now, not when slots where released a year ago? And why on a flash-based casino like you've stated?

In any case I donate by mail. domokun


commentCommented on: Fri Oct 06, 2006 @ 03:35am
Well, they're picking on us now because of the gambling bill so nicely explained by the animation in the Daily Show clip. What depresses me is that there's such a knee-jerk reaction over something that really isn't gambling. The idea that Gaia is a gambling site (and could corrupt the pwoor widdle childwen!) is based on a really tenuous connection that donations of real money equal letters, which are then used to gamble. Kee-rist, it's easier to gamble with DC items or lurk-earned gold than it would be to convert the letters into tokens. But no, people seem to have an allergy to thinking, because differentiating between children's games and an online bookie is so goddamn difficult.



fubenkunai
Community Member
Druki
Community Member
avatar
commentCommented on: Fri Oct 06, 2006 @ 05:02am
I think they have trouble because they didn't refine the definition of a casino or gambling in the bill. If they don't specify what those are, then pretty much placing something down on chance at the possibility of a gain would classify as gambling, regardless of how it's down or how directly or indirectly the money is used to gamble, if at all.


commentCommented on: Fri Oct 06, 2006 @ 07:55am
I've had this damn Python sketch stuck in my head for weeks now, and I finally get a chance to use it in context. "eBay? ******** the ******** ********."



Star_Lily
Community Member
Artess
Community Member
avatar
commentCommented on: Sat Oct 07, 2006 @ 07:36am
Gambling to get pixelated gold to buy pixelated items is not the same as blowing real resources to get absolutely nothing. I honestly don't see the connection, as the outcome of Gaia gambling is generally positive, and the outcome of real gambling is generally negative.


User Comments: [5] [add]
 
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum